Speaking of image ownership, a freelance photojournalist [won a landmark case against his agency](http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/2236638/agence-francepresse-infringed-on-photographers-copyright-in-landmark-twitter-case) for distributing a photo posted on his personal twitter feed. And today, group of photo agencies announced a joint legal force to call for a formal legal challenge to fight copyright reform:

> Associated Press, Getty Images, Reuters, British Pathé, Press Association, and the Federation of Commercial and Audiovisual Libraries are objecting to Clauses 66, 67 and 68 of the Enterprise and Regularoty Reform Bill, which will allow the government to make changes to copyright exceptions, reduce the length of term of copyright, and allow the licensing of Orphan Works.

I wonder whose interest the agencies are protecting: the publishers, the investors, or the photographers?